.
Feedback

Immigration: Family Reunification Waiver Rule

Danbury Immigration attorney discusses new Family Unity Waiver Rule for undocumented persons present in the U.S.

 

US Citizenship and Immigration Services has just published the final rule for the Family Unity Waiver on January 3, 2013.  This is a new process which will allow thousands of spouses and children of US citizens to come forward and obtain their green cards. We do not yet have the regulations, instructions or new forms for this Waiver, but we are expecting to receive them shortly.

The Obama Administration wants to promote Family Unity.  Spouses of US citizens are generally given special preference in legalizing their status. However, many thousands of families have a US citizen spouse, married to an undocumented spouse who entered the US without any type of visa.  These undocumented spouses must legalize their status at the US Consulate in their home country, as a type of punishment for having entered the US without any visa at all. 

The problem comes with the 1996 “Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act” (IIRAIRA) IIRAIRA which was partly enacted to “punish persons” who were unlawfully present in the US.  IIRAIRA has a provision requiring anyone who was in the US in unlawful status for more than
one year, and left the US for the personal interview at the US Consulate, to
remain outside the US for a period of 10 years. (If the person was in unlawful status for more than 6 months, but less than one year, and leaves the US, the bar is for 3 years)

There is a possible Waiver of this 10-year bar, but up until now, the Waiver had to be filed at the US Consulate abroad.  The result was that the undocumented spouse had to depart the US for the personal interview at the US Consulate, and hand in the Waiver packet subsequent to the interview.  Reviews of the Waiver packets typically took more than 10 months, and easily up to 18 months or more to review at the US Consulates abroad, leaving families separated for years at a time.

The new Family Reunification Rule:

US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is creating the new form and new regulations for this new process.  As of now, the following appear to be the criteria in order to qualify to qualify for the new Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver:

1 Applicant must be an immediate relative of a US citizen (spouse, child),

2 Applicant must only be inadmissible due to unlawful presence in the US of more than 6 months

3 Applicant must demonstrate that denial of the Waiver would result in extreme hardship to his/her US citizen spouse or parent

4 Applicant must notify the Department of State’s National Visa Center that he/she will be seeking a provision waiver from USCIS.

The Application for the Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver can be filed in the US starting on March 4, 2013.  If approved, the Applicant would then have the US Consulate in his/her own country schedule the personal immigrant visa interview abroad.  This new pre –approval Waiver process is intended to significantly reduce the amount of time US citizens are separated from their qualifying relatives.

The new Family Unity Waiver should affect thousands of families, and should reduce the number of undocumented persons in the US.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wilton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Publius Redux June 18, 2013 at 08:28 pm
Liz: It should be "...Crush List that lets users...". When you type 'let's', it means 'letRead More us'.
Liz Mitchell Worthington June 19, 2013 at 07:54 am
Hey Publius! Thanks for the catch. I posted this yesterday with the very cool Patch app but it mustRead More have auto corrected on me. I've made the change and appreciate you letting me know.
Sanchez June 19, 2013 at 07:51 am
Mad Mothers is a great moniker. Illegals from Mexico have a much much higher incidence of drivingRead More drunk than any other group. Drunk driving is a way of life in Mexico and they bring that here with the deaths and injury that follows. Truly Mad Mothers.
Milton June 19, 2013 at 11:07 am
Very sad indeed. MADD has done great work. It is a real shame that they would let politics trumpRead More protection of our children from drunk drivers
Sanchez June 19, 2013 at 01:53 pm
Milton, it is the same with the environmental groups. they want to protect the snail darter but doRead More not want to get involved with the illegal immigration issue. Why should they you may ask? google images of "border trash" and see why these groups should be concerned.
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:29 pm
And here's more about the article:Read More http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/06/18/ms-magazines-my-month-with-a-gun-story-shooting-blanks/?print=1
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The concluding paragraph from the item above: "Hopefully her 30-day experience will remove herRead More fear of firearms and help her recognize that the vast majority of American firearms owners have taken to their responsibility with the necessary seriousness and gravity required. Maybe she’ll also learn that no matter how many laws you pass, you can’t regulate irresponsibility out of existence. Grown-ups still have to be grown-ups. Maybe she will also learn how the Bill of Rights is supposed to work, and how one amendment strengthens another. At a minimum, people like Heidi Yewman should be passingly familiar with the Constitutional rights they’re agitating to take away from their fellow citizens."
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:44 pm
PR - I am out of town Thursday evening but you should attend this one:Read More http://weston-ct.patch.com/groups/announcements/p/gun-violence-panel-at-trinity-episcopal-this-thursday_087922d8
Bethlehem Lutheran Church June 17, 2013 at 02:36 pm
Photo did not post successfully.
Publius Redux June 17, 2013 at 03:38 pm
A simple truth: when those who call Christ as King do that which He has commanded, we realize thatRead More none of us need the government's handouts, which is just a 'slave to the lender' mindset.
Ronnie Raygun June 17, 2013 at 09:32 am
never forget Newtown...!! (RNS) Each Father’s Day, Neil Heslin and his son, Jesse Lewis, usedRead More to go to a car show. But that tradition died when 6-year-old Jesse was shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. This Father’s Day, Heslin, who has been active with other Sandy Hook parents in pushing for gun control legislation, is giving his support to the No Father’s Day campaign. Speaking at a media teleconference to launch the campaign, Heslin said, “Jesse was my only child, my only immediate family. I don’t have a father to share Father’s Day with.” Initiated by PICO National Network’s Lifelines to Healing Campaign, the campaign asks participants to send e-cards to Congress, urging passage of legislation to create universal background checks and end gun trafficking.
Ronnie Raygun June 17, 2013 at 09:32 am
(RNS) Each Father’s Day, Neil Heslin and his son, Jesse Lewis, used to go to a car show. ButRead More that tradition died when 6-year-old Jesse was shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. This Father’s Day, Heslin, who has been active with other Sandy Hook parents in pushing for gun control legislation, is giving his support to the No Father’s Day campaign. Speaking at a media teleconference to launch the campaign, Heslin said, “Jesse was my only child, my only immediate family. I don’t have a father to share Father’s Day with.” Initiated by PICO National Network’s Lifelines to Healing Campaign, the campaign asks participants to send e-cards to Congress, urging passage of legislation to create universal background checks and end gun trafficking.
Sanchez June 17, 2013 at 10:27 am
Exploiting dead children for your political points is disgusting and vile. Given the poster thereRead More can be no surprise about such.
Publius Redux June 14, 2013 at 11:17 pm
From linked article_______ "The victims “have a financial uncertainty, they need theRead More money,” Feinberg said. “You have to say, ‘Here’s the money, here’s what we’re doing with it.’” Some Newtown families say that didn't happen in their town. Lafferty-Hassinger posted to Facebook her frustration about the United Way requiring "proof of hardship" to determine how to distribute funds: "We shouldn't have to fight for what is rightfully ours, but we won't be taken advantage of in our darkest hour," she wrote. "We've all been walking a fine line between not wanting to profit from the death of our loved ones and not wanting someone else to profit from our source of grief. We went down when we were kicked, but we are Sandy Hook. It's time to stand back up."___________ I reckon my questions are thusly: What financial uncertainty is there in the death of a child, AND since when did money that is donated privately become something that is 'rightfully' belonging to someone else due to a tragedy that is not a natural event like a tornado or hurricane?