Weakness in Obama's White House: 'The Price of Politics'

How expensive is the price of politics? Costlier than you can imagine, as journalist Bob Woodward details in his new book "The Price of Politics."


If you haven’t had the chance to read Bob Woodward’s new book The Price of Politics, put it at the top of your things-to-do-before-November list. This fascinating, revealing portrait details how deals do -- and don't -- get done in the Obama administration.

The book focuses squarely on the negotiations preceding the 2011 debt ceiling legislation. The cast of characters includes President Barack Obama, Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leaders Eric Cantor and Harry Reid, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Joe Biden.

I’ll be frank: Woodward does no favors for President Obama and his team of White House staffers. In fact, the book is a perfect testament as to why electing someone to the presidency who has no prior management experience is a major mistake.

Obama has made a habit of blaming Congressional gridlock as the reason he can’t get anything done. And although there is plenty of truth in that, the Obama administration set the tone early in his administration with (ironically enough) astoundingly poor communication skills, zero understanding of how to build relationships within Congress, broken promises and arrogance.

Take a mental journey back to winter 2008. The Republicans were persona non grata on the Hill. Obama got handed a big plate of mess: a terrible recession, exploding debt and two expensive foreign wars. Pundits wondered if the Republicans were becoming a regional party instead of a national force.

Nevertheless, Obama reached out to the downtrodden conservatives to ask for help crafting a bipartisan stimulus plan (remember that?). Boehner and Cantor took to the task enthusiastically and presented a "serious proposal," according to Obama.

Of course, he promptly ignored it, despite promising explicitly to include Republicans on the deal. Instead, according to Woodward, the administration presented a “Democratic spending wish list” that even members of his own party hated.

When members of both parties complained, Rahm “Potty Mouth” Emanuel said, “f*** ‘em, we have the votes.”

And that’s just the beginning.

Following the passage of the stimulus plan, the White House failed to build relationships on the Hill -- even within the Democratic Party. Past administrations relied heavily on these relationships, because building these bridges ensured that a sitting president could exert his will by leveraging them to facilitate passage of important legislation.

There has been no such outreach from the Obama White House and very little Congressional understanding as to who’s really in charge at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.; Reid and Pelosi often expressed frustration at the President’s lack of understanding of how business gets done in Washington.  

And, as Woodward points out, this lack of outreach burned Obama when he attempted to make friends at the worst possible time, after the Republicans came roaring back in 2010.

Biden's Role

In my view, the unsung hero in the Obama administration is unquestionably Vice President Biden. A top negotiator who Woodward reports enjoys a trusting, productive working relationship with Republicans, he worked tirelessly during the 2011 debt crisis to build legislation that incorporates the “some for you, some for me” ethos of deal making.

Naturally, Obama does not seem to appreciate this skill, and here’s where it gets really ugly.

Biden put together a bipartisan committee led by himself and Virginia Republican Eric Cantor. The Biden and Cantor working group met for several weeks and built the foundation of a solid plan.

Cantor warned the group again and again that he could not secure votes from the newly-elected Tea Party faithful if the legislation included any increase in taxes. He observed that these neophytes truly did not understand the seriousness of the debt crisis; some Tea Party members even suggested that a U.S. default might be good for the country (!).

These new members, Cantor said, believed in an “existential” sense that government must cut entitlement spending. And because experienced legislators know that writing law is, in the end, really all about the votes, Cantor refused to accept a deal that he knew had no chance of passing the House.

Nevertheless, the committee continued working and making slow-but-steady progress. But instead of letting the process run its course, Obama secretly reached out to Boehner to negotiate separately. Boehner, foolishly, agreed. Cantor later discovered the end-run and told Biden he could no longer participate in the committee.

Biden not only understood, he agreed.

Once the White House became involved, classic, gut-wrenching gridlock ensued. Exciting highlights include endless fruitless negotiations, a scary threat made by Obama not to release Social Security checks, Republican walkouts following Obama’s last-minute demands for more revenue and fewer spending cuts, and an insistence that any deal must kick the can down the road until (wait for it) after the 2012 election.

Yet what should concern voters most are two interesting facts.

The first is the Obama administration’s failure to come up with a Plan B in the final days before default. Doesn’t management 101 teach us to always, always, always have an alternative? Even a Reid staffer upbraided Obama in the oval office for his failure to contingency plan.

The second is a very telling statement that the President made before the deal was complete:

“’The one thing I said I actually needed,’ the president noted, ‘they didn’t get. I needed this to go past the election, and they didn’t get it for me. This can’t work.’”

No, Mr. President. The one thing you “actually needed” was to avoid an economic disaster, not attempt to guarantee a second term.

The two sides eventually worked out a deal, of course. And as we know, the deal includes us falling off a fiscal cliff in 2013. But hey, what does that matter? It’s past the election.

Alethiologist October 09, 2012 at 10:18 PM
Truth be told, the economic mess was the direct result of the repeal of Glass-Stegall in 1999 under Clinton and the lifting of restrictions on the futures trading market that caused the inflationary rush to commodity speculation. Interestingly, the federal governments tax take in 2007 (or 2008?) was the highest in history despite the Bush tax cuts. In any event, this election is about the future not the past. Do you want to simply redistribute existing wealth with Obama or do you want to create more wealth for all Americans with Romney? I vote for more wealth or all.
Rational Wilton Mom October 09, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Don't you mean create even more wealth for the already obscenely wealthy? And by the way, Evelyn, Bush did nothing to repeal the Gramm, Leach, Bliley Act that Clinton put into place. That Act truly helped out Bush's cronies on Wall Street, just as the war truly helped out Chaney and Haliburton. You know, the war that was created because the "bad" guy had weapons of mass destruction (not).
Alethiologist October 09, 2012 at 11:56 PM
No, I mean the pie has to get larger so all of us have the opportunity to have more. Just dividing the same size pie into smaller slices will eventually make all of us hungry. Obama too had the chance to reinstate Glass-Stegal but instead, he let Dodd, Frank push thru a seriously flawed alternative. If I were he or his successor, I would immediately restore it. It worked just fine for decades did it not? Sounds like you are willing to give Clinton a pass for failing to stop the repeal but to indict bush for letting it stand....?!? In any event, it's about the future. Obama is not running against Bush, and he is obviously not running against the portrait he composed for Romney these last several months.
Jeanie C. Riley October 10, 2012 at 01:17 AM
Rational Mom: You say many people didn't vote for Obama because they're racist. You're right, of course, but the flip side is that many voted for him specifically because he is black . Looking back on it, that's the primary reason I voted for him. But let me tell you something: I'm over my white guilt. The guy's an empty suit.
Cliff Cuming October 10, 2012 at 02:14 AM
Empty suit, empty chair, empty podium, empty promises, empty performance. Romney's annual charitable donations exceed o's net worth.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »