.
Feedback

Where Do Republicans Go From Here?

If the Republicans couldn't beat 7.9 percent unemployment, rising taxes and debt, a lackluster housing market and a recent terrorist attack overseas, columnist Lisa Bigelow believes it's time for them to rethink their message to the electorate

 

You could see defeat in their faces on Fox News as the returns began rolling in.

Pennsylvania? “Fool’s gold.” Michigan? “That was a long shot, anyway.” Virginia? “It all depends on Fairfax County.” Florida? “It’s the voters in the I-4 corridor.”

And, of course, Ohio.

Indeed, only the brilliant, but reviled Republican strategist Karl Rove looked optimistic after 9 p.m.

At 10:30, my husband and I turned off the television, a persistent, sinking feeling in our collective gut. I woke at 1 a.m. and couldn’t resist grabbing my phone and loading Drudge.

Headline: “The Divided States of America.”

Sigh. So close. So close.

Naturally, sleep proved elusive as I pondered the meaning of the results. Although exit poll voters gave the edge on the economy to Romney, Obama still won. Women and minorities supported the president roundly, while white men, upper income voters, the religious right and other traditional conservative stalwarts supported Romney.

Of course, defeating an incumbent president is nearly impossible. But the fact that Republicans didn’t win in a landslide last Tuesday indicates the party of Lincoln has an elephant-sized case of head-in-the-sanditis.

Republican strategists will no doubt spend a lot more time analyzing this past election than I will. While I’m sure we’ll all hear tons about how GOP candidates need to do a better job getting their message out to Hispanics and middle-income moms, the problem isn’t the breadth of communication; it’s the communication itself.

I think Washington has a habit of underestimating the man (or woman) in the street. Voters get what the Republicans are saying. They just don’t like it.

That doesn’t mean they embrace the liberal agenda, either, as evidenced by the halfhearted endorsement of the Obama mandate. It just means that they found the reality of another Obama administration more tolerable than the idea of a Romney administration.

The long-held assumption that America is a center-right country is false. We’re center-center. We want compromise. And nobody, from the single mom waitress in Cuyahoga County to the hedge fund manager in New Canaan, wants to see the government waste taxpayer money.

Let’s not forget, the fact of the matter is George W. Bush spent money like a drunken sailor and left Obama with a big fat mess. It’s not as if the economy was plugging along nicely and Obama wrecked it. The ugly truth is the country has still not recovered from the Bush years. Voters recognized it. Republican leadership should, too.

But the common thread between all of the reasons voters chose Obama is the Republicans’ insistence on not accepting the reality of the shifting priorities of the American electorate.

When Romney shifted to the right on immigration that was a big mistake. Why? Although rounding up illegal immigrants and shipping them back home sounds great on paper, it is not a practical solution to our border problem. Developing a sensible amnesty program is and Hispanic voters noticed.

Maintaining a pro-life platform was an even bigger mistake and the right wing needs to accept America is never going to outlaw abortion. Women noticed and they're tired of it. Yes, I know no one even talked about overturning Roe v. Wade. If you don’t want an abortion, don’t get an abortion—but let others make their own choices. Voters believe that is the American way.

Romney also would have been better off taking credit for the truth of being the ideological father of Obamacare (and also for being pro-choice while leading Massachusetts). Standing up to the noisy far right, with whom northeastern and west coast voters do not identify, would have demonstrated courageous leadership. And though it would have made the GOP faithful red-faced in anger, it would have garnered the respect of voters. 

Finally, how refreshing would it have been to hear Romney say, “I think we should keep the Bush tax cuts. But healing a divided nation and making real progress will only be achieved through bipartisan legislation. That’s why I cannot release specific details now.

“I need the American people to give me a chance to sit down with our Democratic friends and work out a compromise that every party can be proud of. It may include entitlement cuts and higher revenues. But we won’t know how great our nation could be unless you elect me to prove it.”

Alas, it was not to be.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wilton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Dan B November 11, 2012 at 07:30 pm
Hi Lisa - nice analysis, and couldn't agree more. There are a few issues with the Republican party (and there are quite a few with the Democratic party as well, but I want to stay on topic...) In my opinion, the issues can be boiled down to: The big tent is too big, and there aren't enough people in it.
In 2012, it's a huge mistake to lump social conservatives and fiscal conservatives together. At least if the intent is to win national and moderate state elections. I believe the vast majority of people in the country fall somewhere on the fiscal conservative / fiscal pragmatist / fiscal responsibility spectrum. But I also believe that a huge number of them are repulsed by the social conservative agenda and are voting blue in large numbers as a result. Everyone's voice deserves to be heard, but the Republicans have a severe identity crisis they they need to resolve. The platform in its current form will not win presidential elections given the current makeup of the electorate and the continuing evolution of that electorate. Either their platform needs to change, or we need a third party in this country that espouses fiscal responsibility, social libertarianism / progressivism, and a pragmatic stance on immigration, foreign policy/engagement, and global trade / national competitiveness. The times, they are a changin'. Let's see how the two-party system goes along for the ride.
Connecticut15 November 12, 2012 at 03:50 pm
Before we jump on the bandwagon about a big tent with too few people in it, take a look at how large the popular votes were and how slim the margins were in the swing states that did not require photo ID BUT had such severe voter irregularities that more votes were tabulated than actual eligible voters - Ohio and Florida as examples. Cleveland districts and Allen West's Florida districts are prime examples.
There is veritable and verifiable respect of others in the Republican party. What there isn't is respect for voting integrity in this country. Just ask AG Holder about the bully stick outside the Phillie precinct. Military absentee ballots were sent out too late and returned too late in some states.
Cliff Cuming November 13, 2012 at 10:51 am
I for one, am baffled so many want to be mollycoddled by big government & want others to pay for it.
What happened to the self-reliant American? Or is the "revenge" vote the wave of the future?
Yooper November 16, 2012 at 05:06 am
OK. This is the first column I have seen that deserved your former "rhetoric free" tagline. You make a thoughtful analysis, free of talking points. Without going into detail, I agree Republicans need to rethink their game plan. We need a functioning two-party system; a third party is highly unlikely. Unfortunately, as evidenced by two or your three previous commenters, there are too many people who are clinging to an alternate reality, fueled by talk radio and that "Fair and Balanced" channel.
Lisa Bigelow November 19, 2012 at 01:10 pm
Yooper ... do my eyes deceive me ... or is your comment a compliment? :)
Thanks for reading, as always. We will see what develops over the next few weeks with the fiscal cliff. I hope Congress can at least pass the tax reform quickly that both parties agree on (keeping rates the same for under 250k). That would eliminate a lot of the uncertainty and the two sides can hammer out a deal on the rest. Only time will tell! And -- my apologies for the delayed reply. Our family is moving in two weeks and I haven't been tethered to my computer like I usually am! Lisa B.
Alethiologist November 19, 2012 at 04:14 pm
After effectively barring conservative columnist Ann Coulter from speaking on campus last week, the Jesuit college Fordham University welcomed infanticide and bestiality advocate Peter Singer for a panel discussion on Friday.
According to Fordham’s media relations website, Singer, a tenured Princeton bioethics professor, spoke from 4 to 6 p.m. in a panel the university promised “will provoke Christians to think about other animals in new ways.” Singer has long lamented the societal stigma against having sex with animals.
Yooper November 27, 2012 at 07:44 pm
Although we have different viewpoints, I call balls and strikes as I see them.
For instance, this morning I heard Senators McCain, Graham, and Ayotte (sp) comment after their meeting with Ambassador Rice and was thoroughly disgusted with their partisan pettiness masquerading as patriotism when there are so many more important issues they could be dealing with.
Alethiologist November 28, 2012 at 10:22 am
AZZ
Are any of your comments, here or elsewhere, intended to help advance a rational point of view ?
Connecticut15 November 30, 2012 at 07:17 pm
Yooper - IT is critically important to learn how our Ambassador was given incorrect information from the White House apparently - since Petraeus and others have reaffirmed their intelligence was altered - and there was a cover up to keep the information from the public before an election? THis follows an terrible pattern of distortion and lack of transparency from this administration. How do we with any conscience endorse putting our citizens at risk under this type of management and lack of commitment in protecting our diplomats, our employees, our citizens abroad. A total lack of leadership. Just like kicking the can down the road wrt entitlement cuts. A total lack of leadership or worse.
Connecticut15 November 30, 2012 at 07:20 pm
So, freedom of speech, diversity of opinion only applies to bestiality and liberals. Any conservative is not included - inclusion only through exclusion. Makes total sense in this day when 1/4 of a million dollars equates to 1 million dollars per liberal perspectives. Nothing means what it should anymore....depends on what 'is' means.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Publius Redux June 18, 2013 at 08:28 pm
Liz: It should be "...Crush List that lets users...". When you type 'let's', it means 'letRead More us'.
Publius Redux June 18, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Hmm. Okay, so let me get this straight: if a legal American citizen drives drunk and kills someone,Read More this is bad according to MADD. But if an illegal alien does likewise, they (MADD) turn away and feign ignorance. I see. Yes, that makes perfect sense. Of course.
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:29 pm
And here's more about the article:Read More http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/06/18/ms-magazines-my-month-with-a-gun-story-shooting-blanks/?print=1
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The concluding paragraph from the item above: "Hopefully her 30-day experience will remove herRead More fear of firearms and help her recognize that the vast majority of American firearms owners have taken to their responsibility with the necessary seriousness and gravity required. Maybe she’ll also learn that no matter how many laws you pass, you can’t regulate irresponsibility out of existence. Grown-ups still have to be grown-ups. Maybe she will also learn how the Bill of Rights is supposed to work, and how one amendment strengthens another. At a minimum, people like Heidi Yewman should be passingly familiar with the Constitutional rights they’re agitating to take away from their fellow citizens."
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:44 pm
PR - I am out of town Thursday evening but you should attend this one:Read More http://weston-ct.patch.com/groups/announcements/p/gun-violence-panel-at-trinity-episcopal-this-thursday_087922d8
Bethlehem Lutheran Church June 17, 2013 at 02:36 pm
Photo did not post successfully.
Publius Redux June 17, 2013 at 03:38 pm
A simple truth: when those who call Christ as King do that which He has commanded, we realize thatRead More none of us need the government's handouts, which is just a 'slave to the lender' mindset.
Ronnie Raygun June 17, 2013 at 09:32 am
never forget Newtown...!! (RNS) Each Father’s Day, Neil Heslin and his son, Jesse Lewis, usedRead More to go to a car show. But that tradition died when 6-year-old Jesse was shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. This Father’s Day, Heslin, who has been active with other Sandy Hook parents in pushing for gun control legislation, is giving his support to the No Father’s Day campaign. Speaking at a media teleconference to launch the campaign, Heslin said, “Jesse was my only child, my only immediate family. I don’t have a father to share Father’s Day with.” Initiated by PICO National Network’s Lifelines to Healing Campaign, the campaign asks participants to send e-cards to Congress, urging passage of legislation to create universal background checks and end gun trafficking.
Ronnie Raygun June 17, 2013 at 09:32 am
(RNS) Each Father’s Day, Neil Heslin and his son, Jesse Lewis, used to go to a car show. ButRead More that tradition died when 6-year-old Jesse was shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. This Father’s Day, Heslin, who has been active with other Sandy Hook parents in pushing for gun control legislation, is giving his support to the No Father’s Day campaign. Speaking at a media teleconference to launch the campaign, Heslin said, “Jesse was my only child, my only immediate family. I don’t have a father to share Father’s Day with.” Initiated by PICO National Network’s Lifelines to Healing Campaign, the campaign asks participants to send e-cards to Congress, urging passage of legislation to create universal background checks and end gun trafficking.
Sanchez June 17, 2013 at 10:27 am
Exploiting dead children for your political points is disgusting and vile. Given the poster thereRead More can be no surprise about such.
Publius Redux June 14, 2013 at 11:17 pm
From linked article_______ "The victims “have a financial uncertainty, they need theRead More money,” Feinberg said. “You have to say, ‘Here’s the money, here’s what we’re doing with it.’” Some Newtown families say that didn't happen in their town. Lafferty-Hassinger posted to Facebook her frustration about the United Way requiring "proof of hardship" to determine how to distribute funds: "We shouldn't have to fight for what is rightfully ours, but we won't be taken advantage of in our darkest hour," she wrote. "We've all been walking a fine line between not wanting to profit from the death of our loved ones and not wanting someone else to profit from our source of grief. We went down when we were kicked, but we are Sandy Hook. It's time to stand back up."___________ I reckon my questions are thusly: What financial uncertainty is there in the death of a child, AND since when did money that is donated privately become something that is 'rightfully' belonging to someone else due to a tragedy that is not a natural event like a tornado or hurricane?